Chris Wellington “The Recruiting Guy”, President, The Wellington Group

Ok people, we were all given a “proper” name or at least one much longer or more formal than the one in which we go by, send out emails with and answer to when called. So why is this important in the World of Work? Just like in my previous post, “Is Your Resume Format Hurting Your Job Search,” there are some challenges with not knowing and following how modern technology(s) and recruiters work so you can take full advantage of these systems. More so, you don’t want the little items such as what I rant about below to be the cause for not getting the job! While I am sure my mother had good reason to give me such a grand name as Christopher Clyde Wellington (Wellington came from my adopted Alaskan family), if I don’t use this across the web, in my emails or even in answering the phone how would the recruiter or HR person looking for me, well know it is truly me?

The biggest challenge lies with modern HRIS or ATS systems (you know, that “system” many recruiters and all HR people say you need to apply to). The platform has advanced such in the past few years to more accurately capture or “parse” the information off your resume in a very automatic, non-human operation. The computer has evolved as has the software, but it still can’t call Christopher Clyde Wellington just Chris. No, now when the recruiter goes into the system to look for me, well I am just not there. Truth be told I am there just not as Chris. This is much more of a problem when people use their middle name, nickname, family name if not from the US, etc.

The same holds true for social media profiles and being found on the web. Today’s recruiter, even some in corporate recruiting jobs, use social media more and more for their primary recruitment tool, or to find you on the web. But it’s impossible to truly swim through the sea of Christopher’s if I am known only as Chris. Besides all the fun people will have in “reviewing” and sharing my given name (thanks mom), it does not help my personal branding efforts, a critical component in this modern era of high visibility.

So what happens in this situation? Again if you have been following my blog posts, trainings or web articles you will know recruitment has evolved to a lazy, speed game in my opinion. Instead of seeking out why Jonathan J Weeber is not in the “system” the recruiter or HR person will tend to move on to the next candidate they can find. So what if Jonathan goes by Luke with no Middle Initial* on the internet nor in his email, next! If you are Jonathan J Weeber but go by Luke Weeber, have Luke Weeber on your resume, job boards, social media profiles, and so forth.

In short, don’t try to get overly fancy and presumptuous on your resume. Throw out the old-school rules of having the formal name given at birth (or after) and go by what you are called on a daily basis so that your resume and the social media profiles can allow you to be found in the current sea of competition. After all, you will have plenty of time to write out that more formal name, over and over again, on all the mandated paperwork and internal hiring documents ONCE YOU LAND THAT NEW JOB!

Good luck and keep working at it!

Chris

*One side note, careful using your Middle Initial on your resume. Most applicant tracking systems and even major job boards are still struggling with this extra name field and as such so are the recruiters and HR people using them.

^{To hire The Recruiting Guy as a speaker or trainer visit The Recruiting Guy or contact The Wellington Group @ info@thewellington-group.com.}

Chris Wellington “The Recruiting Guy”, President, The Wellington Group

Wow, I don’t think this was at all what people were expecting to see and read about, DOL News Release. Most had predicted as high as 11% unemployment and continued doom and gloom in the job market. The impact of a much stronger (lower) unemployment number is not hitting the markets yet, the DOW again for a second day has started off below 10,000.

So what is truly in this DOL report and what can we take away from it? First, the overall number has not changed and is in fact negative by 20,000 more unemployed Americans. While job losses have slowed the job increases have not caught up yet. Healthcare continues to be a strong and growing sector, opposite to the continued decrease in construction jobs in the US. Manufacturing jobs rose by 11,000 while an even bigger gain was seen in retail jobs, 42,000. Transportation took a hit, but it’s such an undefined or obscure category that needs further analysis of the data points and types of jobs lost to understand the root cause. An interesting statistic on job increases was the number of new Government hires in January. 33,000 people put to work, with just less than half of that being the 2010 Census project, so more hires will be coming in this sector for sure.

One great sign for professionals in the recruitment and more so temporary labor industry, 52,000 new heads out in January. For those who have studied this piece of the overall trending data going back generations now, temporary help is a first key indicator of jobs coming back. It’s a “dip your toes in the water” scenario, if you will, by many employers to see what impact that person(s) may have in driving ROI to the organization. A great data point which is not tracked nor communicated well is the ratio of temporary labor headcount turned into full time employees. Since September, the temporary labor job number has increased by 247,000.

Ok, if you have looked at the numbers and are hearing the news then 9.7% does not seem correct. We went to the negative more but had a decrease in the total unemployed? My speculation for this is twofold. First, more people are getting out of the mainstream job market and starting their own businesses. Not hiring others, but sole proprietors working now in every niche from drug development consulting to accounting services and even a major spike in network marketing enrollees. Secondly, some people have simply quit looking for a job and their unemployment has run its course. As a result they are not reporting weekly status updates to the Fed, and as such the DOL can’t report data it does not have.

In the DOL’s own release 2.5 million people were not counted as “They were not counted as unemployed because they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey.” These are mainly disgruntled Americans who feel there is no work for them.

Overall, it is exciting to see that we are back in a more “normal” range for unemployment. I am a believer that levels we have been seeing over the past 6 months are the new norm. 4-5% unemployment rates are in the past or the distant future until all the uncertainty surrounding healthcare, small business (individuals making over $250,000) tax rates, lending and other impending items are worked out between Congress and the Whitehouse.

Chris